Bombardier CL-600-2B19 N866AS
7 June 2011 · Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States · No injuries
Summary
On 7 June 2011 at about 02:32 local time, a Bombardier CL-600-2B19 registered N866AS, operated by Skywest Airlines Inc, was involved in an incident near Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States. 44 people were on board and nobody was injured. The aircraft was slightly damaged. The NTSB has published a probable cause for this accident; it is quoted in full below.
The record
- Date
- at 02:32
- Classification
- Incident
- Location
- Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
- Nearest airport
- General Mitchell Intl (MKE)
- Coordinates
- 42.9517, -87.8942
- Aircraft
- Bombardier CL-600-2B19
- Registration
- N866AS
- Category
- Airplane
- Year built
- 2001
- Engines
- 2
- Operator
- Skywest Airlines Inc
- Operating rule
- Part 121: Air Carrier
- Phase of flight
- Not recorded
- Route
- Covington → Milwaukee
- Aircraft damage
- Minor
- Weather
- VMC
- Light
- Night
- NTSB number
- CEN11IA379
People
Nobody was injured.
| On board | Died | Serious | Minor | Uninjured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44 |
Probable cause
The failure of the right main landing gear (MLG) to extend normally, which resulted from the combination of a slightly worn uplock pin, the operation of the hydraulic pumps below their specified operating pressures, and contamination within the landing gear hydraulic system. Also causal to the accident was the failure of the right MLG to extend manually using the alternate gear selector handle due to the improper use of lubricant within the alternate release handle assembly, which prevented the handle from remaining in its fully extended position.
Quoted verbatim from the NTSB record. This site does not paraphrase or interpret it.
Read the full NTSB narrative
During final approach, the transport-category airplane's right main landing gear (MLG) did not extend when the landing gear selector was placed in the "down" position. Shortly after, the flight crew noted a "gear disagree" warning message displayed on the engine indication and crew alerting system showing that the nose gear and the left MLG were down and locked but that the right MLG was in transit. The flight crew followed the quick reference handbook directions to troubleshoot the landing gear issue without success. The flight crewmembers then tried to manually extend the landing gear by pulling the landing gear alternate release handle multiple times; however, the right MLG failed to extend, and they subsequently landed the airplane with the right MLG retracted. During postincident activities, the airplane was lifted and an examination revealed that the right MLG remained in its full-up position within the wheel well. The airplane's right MLG uplock pin exhibited signs of slight wear, consistent with in-service usage, and no abnormalities were found with the right MLG uplock assembly. Normal wear patterns were observed on the uplock latch with no discernable depth at the pin contact locations. The uplock pin's slight wear indicates that it might not have always rotated freely when it was in contact with the upper and lower surfaces of the uplock assembly latch as it should have per the system's design. Further, the worn pin could have increased the friction forces between the pin and the latch. Functional testing of the incident airplane's 3A and 3B hydraulic system pumps showed that their output pressures were lower than specified. Analysis of hydraulic fluid samples taken from the No. 3 hydraulic system, including the right sidestay actuator and selected landing gear components, revealed that some of the fluid samples contained particles and fibers that exceeded the in-service size limits specified in the airplane's maintenance manual, and these contaminants likely restricted the hydraulic flow within the hydraulic assembly. It is unlikely that any of these factors (the slightly worn uplock pin, the operation of the hydraulic pumps below their specified operating pressures, or the contamination within the landing gear hydraulic system) would have individually prevented the right MLG from extending; however, it is likely that the combination of these factors prevented the right MLG from extending. In addition, the overall landing gear system design, including modifications made in accordance with an airworthiness directive, did not preclude the consequence that the intermittent combination of these factors prevented the right MLG from extending normally. Postincident examination of the cockpit revealed that the landing gear alternate release handle remained extended about 7 inches. Pulling up on the handle resulted in it moving about 3 additional inches to its fully extended position. The additional handle displacement resulted in the right MLG extending out of its wheel well. When the handle was released from its fully extended position, the handle automatically began to slowly retract, which caused the right MLG to stop extending. The handle had to be pulled and manually held in its fully extended position for the right MLG to extend to its down-and-locked position. During postincident functional testing of the landing gear alternate release handle assembly, the handle's locking mechanism failed to maintain the handle in its fully extended position when a specified retract load was applied to the assembly. Disassembly of the handle assembly did not reveal any mechanical discrepancies. However, the assembly's inner housing and outer slider were found coated with an oily material consistent with lubricant; the origin of the oily material could not be determined. The alternate release handle assembly design specifications do not call for the application of lubricant on the inner housing or the outer slider; therefore, it is likely that the lubricant prevented the handle from remaining in its fully extended position.
Quoted verbatim from the NTSB record.
Other Bombardier CL-600 accidents
| Date | Aircraft | Location | Operator | Outcome | Died |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Sep 2011 | Bombardier CL-600-2B19 | Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States | Atlantic Southeast Airlines Inc | No injuries | - |
| 30 Mar 2011 | Bombardier CL-600-2B19 | Detroit, Michigan, United States | Pinnacle Airlines Inc | No injuries | - |
| 18 Oct 2010 | Bombardier CL-600-2B19 | Phoenix, Arizona, United States | SkyWest Airlines | No injuries | - |
| 21 Sep 2012 | Bombardier CL-600 CHALLENGER | Denver, Colorado, United States | Worldwide Jet Charter LLC | No injuries | - |
| 19 Jul 2012 | Bombardier CL-600-2C10 | Peoria, Illinois, United States | American Eagle Airlines Inc | Serious injuries | - |
| 29 Apr 2010 | Bombardier CL-600-2B19 | Burbank, California, United States | Skywest Airlines Inc | Unknown | - |
Other accidents in this area
| Date | Aircraft | Location | Operator | Outcome | Died |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2011 | Cessna TU206G | Shawno, Wisconsin, United States | - | Minor injuries | - |
| 29 Apr 2011 | Jurmu STOL CH701 | Pulaski, Wisconsin, United States | - | Fatal | 1 |
| 25 Jul 2011 | Piper J3L-65 | Van Dyne, Wisconsin, United States | Steven A. Staples | Fatal | 2 |
| 25 Jul 2011 | Gottschalk John R JOHN 1 | Oshkosh, Wisconsin, United States | Paul Minear | No injuries | - |
| 17 Oct 2011 | Piper PA-28R-200 | Watertown, Wisconsin, United States | Wisconsin Aviation-Four Lakes Inc | No injuries | - |
| 23 Jul 2011 | Cessna 172B | Middleton, Wisconsin, United States | - | No injuries | - |