Aviation Crash Map

Supernal SUP83-1 N283TD

29 June 2023 · California City, California, United States · No injuries

Summary

On 29 June 2023 at about 15:05 local time, a Supernal SUP83-1 registered N283TD, operated by Supernal LLC, was involved in an accident near California City, California, United States. One person was on board and nobody was injured. The aircraft was substantially damaged. The NTSB has published a probable cause for this accident; it is quoted in full below.

The record

Date
at 15:05
Classification
Accident
Location
California City, California, United States
Coordinates
35.0817, -118.0939
Aircraft
Supernal SUP83-1
Registration
N283TD
Category
Powered-Lift
Engines
6
Operator
Supernal LLC
Operating rule
Part 91: General Aviation
Purpose of flight
Flight Test
Phase of flight
Not recorded
Aircraft damage
Substantial
Weather
VMC
Light
Day
NTSB number
DCA23LA340

People

Nobody was injured.

On board Died Serious Minor Uninjured
1 0 0 0 1

Probable cause

Erroneous signal processing that resulted in a total loss of propulsion power.

Quoted verbatim from the NTSB record. This site does not paraphrase or interpret it.

Read the full NTSB narrative

On June 29, 2023, at 0805 Pacific daylight time (PDT), a Supernal, LLC., SUP83-1 unmanned aircraft system, N283TD, received substantial damage during a developmental test flight at the manufacturer’s test site. There were no injuries. The aircraft was operating with an FAA Certificate of Waiver (COA) 2022-WSA-213-SAC-REV1, under Exemption No. 20050 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2022-1757. According to the operator/manufacturer, the test flights were intended to expand the aircraft’s flight envelope from the previously expanded forward speed envelope of 8 ft/sec to 20 ft/sec. At the beginning of the flight test, hover checks were performed. The first hover was very stable, and during the second hover there were some oscillations that were not present during the first hover. In the second hover, while landing, the aircraft did not detect the ground and the rotors continued rotating and the aircraft oscillated a little. The crew-chief/observer then manually cycled the avionics power by removing the power jumper connector on front of aircraft and reinserted it to reboot the system, after which the GPS and telemetry were noted to be stable. The crew then proceeded to execute the steps for forward flight, and the aircraft remained in GPS fixed mode as it climbed to 20 ft above ground level (AGL) in a stabilized hover test. After the hover test and systems check, the decision was made to continue the test flight, so the pilot in command (PIC) turned the aircraft to the outbound heading and accelerated it. Upon reaching an acceleration of 9 ft/second the right inceptor, used to control the aircraft about its three axes, was then moved to the detent to capture the 12 ft/sec data point. The aircraft accelerated through the 12 ft/sec targeted velocity data point to the 16 ft/sec data point, at which time the PIC then pulled back inceptor to reduce the speed to the 12 ft/sec data point. During the acceleration and deceleration of the vehicle there were good stable responses to control inputs. The inceptor was then pulled back to achieve maximum deceleration to bring the aircraft to a stop, and the aircraft responded normally, stopping its forward velocity. The inceptor was then moved to the detent to enter the hover position, at which point all power was lost and all rotors stopped turning and the aircraft fell to the ground from a height of about 20 ft AGL. Upon impact with the ground the aircraft bounced and came to rest upside down. There was damage to the landing gear, fuselage, wingtip nacelles, wing booms, tailbooms, and empennage. The accident aircraft, a SUP83-1 unmanned aircraft system, serial number 002, manufactured in 2023, registered to TVPX Aircraft Solutions Inc., and operated by Supernal LLC., as a 25% subscale unmanned test aircraft used to research distributed electric propulsion technologies. The aircraft has six propulsors driven by electric motors that are powered by lithium-ion battery packs.  The aircraft can perform vertical take-offs and landings and can be reconfigured to horizontal flight with lift being generated by its wings. The aircraft is controlled from a handheld transmitter by a remote pilot and monitored by a PC laptop ground station linked to the aircraft via telemetry radios inside a mobile trailer at the test site. At the time of the accident the aircraft had accumulated about 1.9 hours. The pilot was an FAA certified private airplane pilot, and reported 560 hours total flight experience, of which about 1 hour was with the accident aircraft. The test flight was also supported by a visual observer who was stationed near the pilot and one team member who was located inside the ground control station. The pilot, visual observer, and ground control station operator used hands free headsets to maintain communication during the entire event, and there were no communication difficulties. The test site for this aircraft is a privately owned area near California City, California, within the Hyundai Motor Group’s California Proving Grounds automotive testing facility. Surrounded by unimproved desert, the test area has a large, paved ramp area from which operations are conducted along with the supporting infrastructure appropriate for the operations of the site. Per COA, SUP 83-1 was permitted to fly within its test area up to 400’ AGL, remaining clear of both Mojave Air & Spaceport/Rutan Field Airport’s (MHV’s) controlled airspace, and the Edwards Air Force Base’s Restricted Area 2515. Weather was not a factor in the accident. At 0600 PDT the weather at MHV, located 6 miles from the test site, was reported as sky clear with winds variable at 2 kts, visibility 10 statute miles, and temperature 82 degrees. The operator/developer’s post-accident examination revealed that there was erroneous signal processing of commands from the handheld transmitter.  The erroneous signal processing caused the high-voltage contactor on the vehicle to open, resulting in a total loss of propulsion power.  Further analysis of the software and hardware revealed that the contactor command from the handheld transmitter was not filtered, which resulted in short-duration signal noise being unimpeded.

Quoted verbatim from the NTSB record.

Other Supernal SUP83 accidents

Date Aircraft Location Operator Outcome Died
3 Aug 2023 Supernal SUP83-1
N183TD
California City, California, United States Supernal, LLC No injuries -

Other accidents in this area

Date Aircraft Location Operator Outcome Died
21 Nov 2023 Bell OH-58A
N158TR
Brawley, California, United States - No injuries -
1 Jan 2023 Cessna 172
N7181A
Watsonville, California, United States - Serious injuries -
26 Jun 2023 Schleicher Alexander Gmbh & ASH 26 E
N26DX
Williams, California, United States - No injuries -
7 Aug 2023 Bell 407
N555AS
Cabazon, California, United States Air Shasta Rotor & Wing Inc. Fatal 3
29 Nov 2023 Cessna 180J
N9991N
Modesto, California, United States - No injuries -
27 Nov 2023 Cessna 170B
N170HT
Cameron Park, California, United States - Minor injuries -

All 170,864 records in United States