Aviation Crash Map

Airbus A220 HB-JCM

25 July 2019 · Perrigny-sur-Armançon, France · No injuries

Summary

On 25 July 2019 at about 11:05 local time, a Airbus A220 registered HB-JCM, operated by Swiss International Air Lines, was involved in an incident near Perrigny-sur-Armançon, France. 121 people were on board and nobody was injured. The aircraft was slightly damaged. The NTSB has published a probable cause for this accident; it is quoted in full below.

The record

Date
at 11:05
Classification
Incident
Location
Perrigny-sur-Armançon, France
Nearest airport
Charles de Gaulle (CDG)
Coordinates
47.6900, 4.2387
Aircraft
Airbus A220
Registration
HB-JCM
Category
Airplane
Year built
2018
Engines
2
Operator
Swiss International Air Lines
Operating rule
Non-U.S., Commercial
Phase of flight
Not recorded
Route
Geneva → London
Aircraft damage
Minor
Weather
VMC
Light
Day
NTSB number
ENG19IA029

People

Nobody was injured.

On board Died Serious Minor Uninjured
121 0 0 0 121

Probable cause

A No. 1 (left) engine low pressure compressor (LPC) stage 1 integrally bladed rotor (IBR) separation due to a high cycle fatigue crack (HCF) that originated at the runout of an airfoil leading edge root radius. The HCF crack developed as a result of a mechanically coupled LPC stage 3 and stage 1 IBR mode excitation and blade flutter response. The excitation was driven by an acoustic tone generated by turbulent airflow passing over the 2.5 bleed valve duct cavity while the engine was operating at high speeds in specific flight conditions. A primary contributor to the failure mode was an electronic engine control (EEC) software update that changed the LPC vane schedule and increased the likelihood of LPC stage 1 IBR blade flutter onset within the engine operating range.

Quoted verbatim from the NTSB record. This site does not paraphrase or interpret it.

Read the full NTSB narrative

The No. 1 (left) engine low pressure compressor (LPC) stage 1 integrally bladed rotor (IBR) separation was caused by a high cycle fatigue (HCF) crack that originated at the runout of an airfoil leading edge root radius. Acoustic tests, instrumented flight tests, and multiple analytical methods were completed and identified a mechanically coupled LPC stage 3 and stage 1 IBR mode excitation driven by an acoustic coincidence with the 2.5 bleed valve duct cavity. At high engine speeds in specific flight conditions, unsteady or turbulent airflow generated by the LPC IBR blade tips created an acoustic tone as it passed over the 2.5 bleed valve duct cavity, located immediately aft of the LPC (Figure 1). The acoustic tone excited a LPC stage 3 IBR blade 1st bending mode that was mechanically transferred through the LPC module to the LPC stage 1 IBR where a stiffwise bending mode was excited. The resultant stresses on the LPC stage 1 IBR blades exceeded material limits and subsequently led to crack formation and eventual progression to overload failure. Figure 1- Engine LPC Diagram Identifying the stage 3 IBR / 2.5 Bleed Valve Acoustic Interaction Factors that contributed to the LPC acoustic coincidence within the engine operating range were installation of electronic engine control (EEC) Software V2.11.7.2 and low engine operating hours. EEC Software V2.11.7.2 modified the LPC inlet guide vane (IGV) schedule to improve engine surge/stall margin in high power flight phases such as top of climb, by rotating the vanes in the closed direction. The revised vane schedule inadvertently created conditions that were favorable for LPC IBR 3 and IBR 1 flutter onset.   New engines have tighter clearances between the LPC IBR blade tips and the outer air seals. The tighter clearances created unsteady loading at the blade tip region and resulted in stronger acoustic coupling and flutter response. Flight test data confirmed that acoustic coincidence and flutter response within the engine operating range was significantly reduced following an engine rub in period. The Powerplant Group Chairman’s Factual Report available in the investigation docket includes additional information on the LPC acoustic coincidence and the testing and analytical methods used to identify the failure mode.

Quoted verbatim from the NTSB record.

Other Airbus A220 accidents

Date Aircraft Location Operator Outcome Died
16 Sep 2019 Airbus A220
HB-JCA
Côte-d'Or Region, France Swiss International Air Lines No injuries -
12 Feb 2020 Airbus A220
YL-AAU
Bordeaux, France airBaltic No injuries -
26 Dec 2018 Airbus A220
HL8314
Busan, Republic Of Korea KoreanAir No injuries -
11 Jul 2021 Airbus A220
YL-AAQ
Copenhagen, Denmark Air Baltic Unknown -

All 5 records for this type

Other accidents in this area

Date Aircraft Location Operator Outcome Died
14 Nov 2019 Boeing 737
7T-VKR
Lyon, France
no coordinates
Air Algerie Unknown -
9 Aug 2019 Beechcraft 36
OO-JBM
Corse-du-Sud, France - Serious injuries -
27 Oct 2019 Boeing 737
4X-EHE
Paris, France
no coordinates
- Unknown -
13 Jun 2019 Cessna 172
F-GEJD
Sailagouse, France, France - Fatal 2
6 Dec 2019 Boeing 737
7T-VJM
Paris, France
no coordinates
Air Algerie Unknown -
6 Dec 2019 De Havilland DHC6
F-GHRK
Pau Pyrenesse, France
no coordinates
Inter DZ No injuries -

All 285 records in France