Aviation Crash Map

Cessna 172R N28BC

19 April 2012 · Richmond, Kentucky, United States · No injuries

Summary

On 19 April 2012 at about 20:00 local time, a Cessna 172R registered N28BC, operated by Eastern Kentucky University, was involved in an accident near Richmond, Kentucky, United States. 2 people were on board and nobody was injured. The aircraft was substantially damaged. The NTSB has published a probable cause for this accident; it is quoted in full below.

The record

Date
at 20:00
Classification
Accident
Location
Richmond, Kentucky, United States
Nearest airport
Madison Airport (I39)
Coordinates
37.6403, -84.3483
Aircraft
Cessna 172R
Registration
N28BC
Category
Airplane
Year built
2000
Engines
1
Operating rule
Part 91: General Aviation
Purpose of flight
Instructional
Phase of flight
Not recorded
Route
Winchester → Richmond
Aircraft damage
Substantial
Weather
VMC
Light
Day
NTSB number
ERA12LA294

People

Nobody was injured.

On board Died Serious Minor Uninjured
2 0 0 0 2

Probable cause

A total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion. Contributing to the accident was the flight instructor’s failure to supervise the student’s preflight inspection, his inadequate fuel management and preflight and in-flight fuel planning, and the operator’s inadequate fueling policies and procedures.

Quoted verbatim from the NTSB record. This site does not paraphrase or interpret it.

Read the full NTSB narrative

The flight instructor reported that, after getting in the airplane, he asked the student pilot how much fuel was in each tank. The student pilot replied that 21.5 gallons of fuel were in one tank and 20 gallons of fuel were in the other tank. The student pilot reported dipping a "fuel stick" into the fuel tanks during the preflight to check the fuel levels. Although the flight instructor noticed that the fuel quantity indicators showed that 20 gallons of fuel were in one tank and 15 gallons of fuel were in the other tank, he did not question the fuel discrepancy. A review of security camera video revealed that the flight instructor did not supervise the student pilot's preflight inspection nor conduct a walk-around inspection. After departure, the student pilot flew the airplane to another airport for a short- and soft-field training lesson. After 45 minutes of training, they departed for their home airport. Although the flight instructor noticed that the fuel gauges were reading low, he chose to continue the flight. Five miles north of the airport, the engine began sputtering, and the flight instructor took control of the airplane. He turned on the fuel pump and richened the fuel mixture, and the engine started running normally. He then decided to climb to get as much altitude as possible while continuing to fly to the airport. One minute later, the engine lost power. The flight instructor then unsuccessfully attempted to restart the engine. When he realized that the airplane would not make the runway, he decided to land in a field. During the approach and landing roll, the airplane struck power lines, and the right wing struck a tree and was substantially damaged. Examination of the fuel tanks revealed that they were empty and that neither of them was breached. No evidence of fresh fuel staining or leakage was found above or below the wings or on the belly of the airplane. After adding 5 gallons of fuel to the left wing tank, the engine was started, and it ran normally. Examination of the fuel sticks used by the operator revealed that they did not have aircraft registration markings on them to verify if the correct fuel stick was onboard the correct aircraft and that one of the airplanes in the fleet with 20-gallon tanks had a 26.5-gallon fuel stick in the cockpit. It could not be determined whether the student pilot used the proper fuel stick during the preflight inspection. Examination of the operator's fueling pad and parking ramp revealed that they were significantly sloped. Examination of its fueling and parking procedures also revealed that the airplanes were being parked and serviced with the fuel selector valves in the "both" position. According to the airplane manufacturer, the airplane should be parked in a wings-level, normal ground attitude with the fuel selector in the "left" or "right" position to ensure maximum fuel capacity and minimize cross-feeding when refueling.

Quoted verbatim from the NTSB record.

Other Cessna 172 accidents

Date Aircraft Location Operator Outcome Died
9 Sep 2012 Cessna 172N
N1009F
Acreúna Municipality, Brazil - Fatal 4
9 Jul 2012 Cessna 172S
N680MA
Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States Gateway Aviation No injuries -
17 Feb 2012 Cessna 172N
N4737D
Flat Rock, Virginia, United States - No injuries -
16 Nov 2012 Cessna 172
SE-KHX
Ostermaima, Sweden Arbra Flygklubb Hovsatter Fatal 1
22 Sep 2012 Cessna 172S
N21750
Land O'Lakes, Florida, United States - Fatal 1
24 Feb 2012 Cessna 172S
N53589
Key West, Florida, United States Dean International Inc. Fatal 2

All 12,209 records for this type

Other accidents in this area

Date Aircraft Location Operator Outcome Died
19 Aug 2012 Beechcraft A23-19
N4746J
West Liberty, Kentucky, United States Quirk James M Serious injuries -
23 Sep 2012 Cessna 182Q
N735FJ
Fort Thomas, Kentucky, United States - Minor injuries -
25 Sep 2012 Cessna 172P
N53720
Richmond, Kentucky, United States Eastern Kentucky University No injuries -
16 Jul 2012 Infinity INFINITY 2003
N5627G
Wilmore, Kentucky, United States Ferrell Charles Steven Serious injuries -
12 Jun 2012 Bowles Chris KITFOX 5
N903XC
Owenton, Kentucky, United States - Minor injuries -
14 Mar 2012 Cessna T210J
N2275R
Rabbit Hash, Kentucky, United States Naseem M Malik Serious injuries -

All 170,864 records in United States