Cessna 150M N45080

Summary

On 31 July 2012 at about 16:58 local time, a Cessna 150M registered N45080, operated by James L Sainsbury, was involved in an accident near Cottage Grove, Wisconsin, United States. One person was on board and nobody was injured. The aircraft was substantially damaged. The NTSB has published a probable cause for this accident; it is quoted in full below.

Date

31 July 2012 at 16:58

Classification

Accident

Location

Cottage Grove, Wisconsin, United States

Nearest airport

Blackhawk Airfield (87Y)

Coordinates

43.1047, -89.1861

Aircraft

Cessna 150M

Registration

N45080

Category

Airplane

Engines

1

Operator

James L Sainsbury

Operating rule

Part 91: General Aviation

Purpose of flight

Personal

Phase of flight

Not recorded

Route

Unknown → Cottage Grove

Aircraft damage

Substantial

Weather

VMC

Light

Day

NTSB number

CEN12LA507

Nobody was injured.

The pilot's decision to land on a runway with significant overgrown vegetation along the edges and his landing, which was left of the centerline.

Quoted verbatim from the NTSB record. This site does not paraphrase or interpret it.

Read the full NTSB narrative

After an uneventful local flight, the pilot decided to land on runway 4 since he had not landed on that runway in a long time. After a normal approach, the pilot landed the airplane just slightly left of the centerline but did not think that it was overly to the left. As the airplane coasted to taxi speed, the left wing contacted high vegetation and overgrown brush overhanging the left side of the runway. The airplane then veered to the left off the side of the runway and collided into brush and small trees, resulting in substantial damage to the leading edges of both wings. High vegetation, up to 12 feet tall, was found by the runway and was overhanging the west side of the runway by 2 to 4 feet. High vegetation was also overhanging the east side of the runway by 1 to 3 feet. The published runway 4 width is 57 feet, but the usable width for landing was narrowed by about 7 feet due to the overgrown vegetation. The pilot stated that he should have landed on runway 27, knowing that it was clear of vegetation on both sides. He said that he was not aware of just how much brush had overgrown the sides of runway 4 since the last time he landed there a few years ago. The pilot stated that if he had made a more perfect landing on the centerline and rolled out on centerline, the wingtip of the airplane would not have contacted the overgrown brush. Currently, the published information for the airfield includes information stating that brush and high vegetation surround the edges of runways 4/22.

Quoted verbatim from the NTSB record.