Hawker-Beechcraft E-55 N3959W

Summary

On 15 April 2011 at about 13:30 local time, a Hawker-Beechcraft E-55 registered N3959W, operated by Rose Resources Oil & GAS Inc, was involved in an accident near De Queen, Arkansas, United States. One person was on board and one died. The aircraft was substantially damaged. The NTSB has published a probable cause for this accident; it is quoted in full below.

Date

15 April 2011 at 13:30

Classification

Accident

Location

De Queen, Arkansas, United States

Nearest airport

J Lynn Helms Sevier County (KDEQ)

Coordinates

34.0469, -94.3994

Aircraft

Hawker-Beechcraft E-55

Registration

N3959W

Category

Airplane

Engines

2

Operator

Rose Resources Oil & GAS Inc

Operating rule

Part 91: General Aviation

Purpose of flight

Personal

Phase of flight

Not recorded

Route

De Queen → Tulsa

Aircraft damage

Substantial

Weather

VMC

Light

Day

NTSB number

CEN11FA285

1 person died.

The pilot’s loss of control during takeoff for undetermined reasons.

Quoted verbatim from the NTSB record. This site does not paraphrase or interpret it.

Read the full NTSB narrative

The pilot was on a cross-country flight and had spent a night at an en route airport to allow thunderstorms to move past his route of flight. After the storms and rain passed, the pilot continued on his flight the next morning. Witnesses reported that the airplane departed at a steep angle from the runway and that the engines sounded like they were cutting out. One witness added that, when the airplane was an estimated 300 to 500 feet in the air, it looked like the airplane was trying to make a 180-degree turn back to the runway when it appeared to enter an aerodynamic stall and spin to the ground. A postaccident examination of the airplane revealed that the landing gear and flaps were retracted. The airplane’s wing fuel tanks were breached; however, the wing top skin panels displayed hydraulic deformation consistent with a quantity of fuel being present in the fuel tanks at the time of impact. Further examination of the engines did not reveal any anomalies that would have prevented the engines from producing rated power. The examination of the airframe confirmed that the flight control lock was not installed in the pilot’s control column. Additionally, damage and marks found on the front baggage door and cabin nose area were consistent with the door being closed at the time of the accident. Flight control continuity was established. No preimpact abnormalities were found and a reason for the loss of control could not be determined.

Quoted verbatim from the NTSB record.